Where is the “Heart” of Asian America?:
Troubling “American” Identity and Exceptionalism in an Age of Globalization and Imperialism

Chicago specifically and the Midwest generally function as the symbolic “Heartland” of “America,” a culturally homogenous space relative to the main cosmopolitan sites of Asian America on the coasts. The “Chicago School” of sociology has played a large role in shaping the discourse and research on immigration, race, and urban development. Immigrants to this part of the country gradually have assimilated, become “American,” settled into the rhythms of an industrial and capitalist economy, and exhibited “proper,” normative and idealized notions of citizenship: nationalistic, “wholesome,” “corn-fed,” solid “American.” Their ability to do so speaks to the supposed unique character of the U.S. But this is only one face of the Midwest. African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, and Asian Americans have played, both historically and currently, an essential role in building up the area while also serving as the discursive “other.” Even European Americans complicate the notion of uniform Whiteness with sustained enclave settings based on historic and continued migration flows. Still, the “Heartland” serves as an organizing trope in framing the U.S., both internally and abroad. In this age of globalizations and new imperialisms, precisely how does this trope play out? How does Asian American Studies both reinforce and resist, both accept and complicate the framing of the Midwest as the “center” of the United States? This conference seeks to trouble the Midwest as a key space of a homogenous “America.” How does geography shape the experiences and study of Asian America? What are the new politics in the heart of Asian America? How have pan-Asian American movements fared in the Heartland relative to other spaces? What types of inter-racial, intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic coalitions have formed? What implications has the homeland security apparatus had on Arab American and South Asian American relationships with the state? How does the “Heartland” serve as a device in analysis focused on the coasts? Asian American Studies is rooted in challenges to many of the assumptions of the nation, but typically these resistances have been seen as concentrated on the East and West Coasts and not where they supposedly have the most resonance, in the “Heartland.” Yet, the Midwest has given birth to powerful forces of counter-consciousness and interrogated an uncomplicated framing of the idea of a “true America” and essential core of the nation. Here, in the heartland of America, we ask “What is the ‘Heart’ of Asian America?”, how does geography shape and “What is the uniquely Midwestern approach of doing Asian American Studies?”

We encourage submissions that deepen our understanding of the transformative capabilities of a region too often seen as guarding “American-ness.” A range of issues provide complicating potential. The list below is in no way meant to be definitive; we hope you will add to its suggestions:

1. While Asian American studies in recent years have become more focused on the city, we should not forget the idea and physicality of the rural both as a site of normalizing practices as well as a node for community construction apart from the urban.

2. How do population size and geography impact the growth of counter-consciousness movements. For instance, did the smaller size paradoxically lead to easier coalescing, as in, for example, when Chicago Filipino American postal workers organized in the 1920's or in the '70s when Filipino American created the first Filipino American community center in the U.S. - the Rizal Center.

3. How have residential enclaves grown, disappeared, and altered in response to city demographics and politics, and what role do they play for communities with greater or lesser urban density?

4. What lies at the heart of vibrant Asian American commercial and residential enclaves: districts in Chicago such as Devon Street Little India, Lawrence/Bryn Mawr Koreatowns, Uptown's Argyle enclave, South Side Chinatown, and towns like Glendale Heights (near Chicago where the first Filipino American mayor was elected), Skokie, Naperville, University City (MO), or Madison Heights (MI)?

5. How have Asian Americans negotiated the road to political empowerment? There have been interesting campaigns and success stories of Asian Americans elected in regions with very few Asian American registered voters, including State Senator Moua from St. Paul, MN who is the first Hmong American elected official and Swati Dandekar, an Indian American from Des Moines, IA.

6. How have community-based organizations contributed both to community empowerment and to research and teaching in Asian American Studies? How can we in the academy develop stronger relationships with CBO's and non-profits to advance the field and the on-the-ground realities of Asian American communities? How do we link our students to urban, rural, and less visible communities in all regions to minimize the "myopia" in our field? How are organizations focusing on gender, sexual, and class issues creating alliances and moving forward in the age of increased reliance on government and foundation money?

7. What are new trends in ethnic businesses, and how are newer concentrations in the labor market responding to local, national, and international forces (e.g., ethnic-dominated occupational niches include Pakistanis owning over 2/3rds of Dunkin Donuts)? What are the new trends in labor organizing, especially in ethnic niches (e.g. Filipina nurses on strike, forming a new union at Cook County Stroger Hospital)?

8. What, if any, are popular culture representations of Asian Americans that have particular salience, and how are representations shaped not only by national and transnational but also by local forces?

9. How are hate crimes in urban and rural areas symbolic of new or continued trends within Asian America?

10. Can we discern new phenomena in family and religious life? For instance, among the populations demanding our attention are Korean adoptees in Minnesota; Hmongs in small town Wisconsin or urban enclaves in Minneapolis-St. Paul. How are Hmong Americans students faring in schools across small towns in the Midwest where they now represent 20% of the population?

11. How are LBGT communities and allies responding to the growing institutionalized restrictions ushered in by the conservative political Right, well represented in the “Heartland?”

Complete panel submissions (with a minimum of 3 papers and a maximum of 4) will be given priority, but individual paper submissions will also be considered. Submissions of individual papers must identify the main disciplinary linkage or contribution offered by selecting on the key sub-themes listed above that the paper addresses or elaborates upon. We invite submissions for workshops and posters as well.

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: OCTOBER 31, 2007.

Please click here to review paper submission guidelines and to submit paper.